PATH / PRINCIPLE / TRADE-OFF
Route Types and Trade-Offs
IEPL, relay and direct describe how a connection is routed, not a universal speed ranking. Here’s how they generally work and how their costs differ. Actual routing and available options are shown in the user dashboard; a route label is not a performance guarantee.
#Cross-Border Segment
IEPL: Focus on the Cross-Border Segment
IEPL generally refers to cross-border transmission carried over dedicated Ethernet links. Unlike solutions that rely directly on public internet routes, it focuses on managing the cross-border segment and maintaining continuity. Other network segments remain between your device and the service entry point, and between the exit and the target website. A dedicated link doesn't handle the entire connection end to end.
For ongoing conversations, remote collaboration and extended playback, consider comparing IEPL routes and checking whether sessions stay connected and page actions complete reliably. Dedicated links generally involve higher resource and maintenance costs, but this page doesn't use that to imply a separate pricing tier or promise that one route type will outperform another. See the plans page and dashboard for current pricing.
#Entry Path
Relay: Connect Through an Entry Point to an Exit
A relay route adds a forwarding step between your device and the final exit. Your device connects to an entry point first, then reaches the exit over another link. This gives you an alternative to connecting directly to the exit; it isn't just an extra place name. A well-matched entry point may work better with your local network, while congestion at the entry point or along the next link can cause delays or reconnects.
Relay routes can be an option for everyday browsing, cross-region access and work. Costs typically reflect the entry point, forwarding link and exit resources, so it's not accurate to say relays are always cheaper or faster. If something goes wrong, compare alternative paths to the same exit region first. That makes it easier to tell whether the difference comes from the entry point or the target service's regional rules.
#Public Routing
Direct: A Simpler Path, Still Worth Testing
Direct usually means your device connects to the service exit over the public internet without an additional relay entry point. The setup is more straightforward, but public routing depends on your local ISP, interconnection between networks and the route to the destination region. “Direct” doesn't necessarily mean the shortest geographic path or that no other network equipment is involved.
If public routing from your local network to the destination region works well, a direct route may be suitable for browsing and everyday apps. It typically uses fewer dedicated transmission resources than an IEPL link, but that doesn't establish a fixed ranking for price or performance. If performance fluctuates noticeably in the evening, compare a relay or IEPL route under the same conditions rather than ruling one out based on its name.